Skip to main content

CLAIM SCENARIO

Pregnant? You're fired

Brand management specialists Mrs. Black and Mrs. Vasquez were hired by XYZ Realty to act as marketing directors. After one year of employment Mrs. Black advised Mr. Brown, the principal of the firm, that she was pregnant.

Employment practices liability insurance (EPL) protects businesses from claims made by employees regarding discrimination (age, sex, race, disability, etc.), wrongful termination of employment, harassment, and other employment-related allegations. If a judgment or settlement is reached, disbursements and attorneys fees could reach hundreds of thousands of dollars. Without proper EPL coverage, you could be responsible for these costs. 

The facts

XYZ Realty specializes in the sale of residential properties. Brand Management specialists Mrs. Black and Mrs. Vasquez were hired by XYZ Realty to act as marketing directors. After one year of employment, Mrs. Black advised Mr. Brown, the principal of the firm, that she was pregnant. Mrs. Black explained that she would be taking three-months of maternity leave, and that it was her intent to return to her position. However, Mrs. Black never came back to work. Mr. Brown announced Mrs. Black’s decision to not return to work after her maternity leave and several employees joked about her being let go because she was pregnant. Several months after Mrs. Black’s departure, Mrs. Vasquez advised Mr. Brown that she was pregnant and intended to take maternity leave as well.

Two months after Mrs. Vasquez’s announcement, XYZ Realty lost several key agents to a local competitor which lead Mr. Brown to decide a workforce reduction was needed. Mr. Brown decided he was going to take over Mrs. Vasquez’s role as marketing director. He contacted Mrs. Vasquez and advised her that she would be let go from her position. After Mrs. Vasquez was terminated one month prior to her scheduled maternity leave, she quickly filed suit and alleged that she had been wrongfully terminated.

The result

The case proceeded to trial and the jury sympathized with Mrs. Vasquez who delivered a very emotional speech on the stand. Due to Mr. Brown’s statements concerning previous employees and the close proximity in the timing of Mrs. Vasquez’s termination to her scheduled leave, the jury rendered an award to Mrs. Vasquez in the amount of $250,000. XYZ Realty also paid an additional $125,000 to cover Mrs. Vasquez’s attorney fees in addition to the $150,000 owed to its own attorneys for defending the case. The total out of pocket cost for this employment practices liability claim was $525,000.3

Risk factors

Risk factor #1

Mr. Brown should have used outside counsel to evaluate employment practice and severance policies. He should have refrained from self-diagnosis.

Risk factor #2

Mr. Brown should have known that proper notification is very important. There are many cases where employees are filing claims because they were not properly notified of potential termination of employment.

Risk factor #3

During times of economic downturn, the frequency of EPL claims rises and employees are seeking higher damage awards.
 

*The claim scenario is strictly documented for illustrative purposes only and provides an example of what a policy could cover. It is intended to provide a general overview of the program described. Please remember only the insurance policy can give actual terms, coverage, amounts, conditions and exclusions. Program availability and coverage are subject to individual underwriting criteria.

Interested in Real Estate E&O coverage?