
Written by Yvonne Castillo ,
Director of Risk Management
11/08/2023 · 3 minute read
In the ever-evolving landscape of climate legislation, California stands poised on the frontier with groundbreaking new mandates. A recently enacted law, SB 253, requires privately held and publicly traded companies with a financial footprint exceeding $1 billion annually doing business in the Golden State to disclose their greenhouse gas emissions across Scopes 1, 2, and 3. At first glance, this law might appear to cast its net on the giants of industry, but the ripples of its impact will be felt far and wide. If you're in the design world, you’ll want to pay attention: this directly concerns you.
The crux of this legislation isn’t just about emissions from direct operations, but also the far-reaching Scope 3 emissions, encompassing all indirect emissions that occur in a company's value chain. For design firms, this is where things get especially pertinent. Your designs, the materials you specify, and the construction processes can all be a part of these larger companies’ Scope 3 emissions. If a major business client is mandated to report their emissions, they'll be turning to their value chain—firms like yours and the projects you are designing for them—for crucial data.
Elevating the stakes further, SB 261, the Climate-Related Financial Risk Act, demands that companies with annual revenues greater than $500 million also shine a light on the financial risks posed by climate change. This act obligates companies to assess and disclose how climate-related risks and opportunities could affect their finances and operations, encompassing the architectural designs that shape their physical and operational landscape. As design firms, your contributions to reducing these financial risks through sustainable and resilient designs become invaluable. The integration of SB 261 underscores the need for firms to quantify and communicate not just the carbon footprint of their projects, but also their potential financial implications in the context of climate risk. This additional layer of financial risk reporting is set to be a significant factor that design firms must now anticipate and incorporate into their strategic planning.
With these legislative changes, California is laying down the legislative gauntlet for design firms to consider the broader environmental and financial impacts of their work. It's a new dawn of accountability that calls for a strategic realignment toward sustainability and resilience that is as financially astute as it is environmentally conscious. The message is clear: for design firms, the future is now, and it demands action that accounts for the climate and the balance sheet in equal measure.